Bat Digest Logo

2016 Easton Mako Review

Best Bat Digest score 94/100
Top grade A
Score range: 74-94/100 across 6 scored models Top model: 2016 Easton Mako USSSA -11
May 31, 2026
Expert Tested
2016 Easton Mako Review
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more ›

Who should buy the 2016 Easton Mako?

If buying: Consider the 2016 Easton Mako if this matches your player: Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -12 to -3. Choose the exact certification and drop first, then use the score and model table on this page to compare the available versions.

2016 Easton Mako full bat view

Best for

  • Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -12 to -3.
  • Hitters choosing -12 to -3 drops in BBCOR and USSSA.
  • Shoppers comparing multiple drops or certifications inside the same model line.

Skip if

  • You do not want to sort through certification-specific versions before buying.
  • You want a new warranty-backed bat instead of shopping an older model.

Confidence: Published Review This uses Bat Digest catalog data, ratings data, and existing review notes; current availability, warranty coverage, and used-market condition may vary.

Is the 2016 Easton Mako a good bat?

The 2016 Easton Mako (BBCOR) is a two piece composite bat reviewed by Bat Digest.

What should you know about the 2016 Easton Mako?

  • How good is the 2016 Easton Mako in our rankings: It is ranked 1 out of 43 in USSSA -12 bats.
  • Who is the 2016 Easton Mako for: Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -12 to -3.
  • Construction: Two Piece Composite
  • Drop options: -12 to -3
  • Price: $160 - $450

What are the 2016 Easton Mako specs?

  • Year: 2016
  • Brand: Easton
  • Model Name: Mako
  • Drop: -12 to -3
  • Construction: Two Piece Composite
  • Original Price: $160 - $450

What evidence is this based on?

What we know

  • Available as BBCOR and USSSA, -12 to -3 drops, 25 to 34 inches sizes, $160 - $450 pricing.
  • Construction: Two Piece Composite.
  • The score module is generated from Bat Digest ratings data for the associated model set.

What we have not tested yet

  • Every used-market copy or later production batch.
  • Current seller pricing, warranty coverage, and availability.
  • Whether league rules or stamp requirements have changed since the original review period.
  • Variant, drop, size, price, and certification facts come from current Bat Digest catalog data.
  • Buyer-fit language is based on the existing Bat Digest review notes and watchouts in this file.
  • Scores and score ranges come from Bat Digest ratings data rather than static article copy.

What about durability and legality?

Legality: Multi-certification The line spans BBCOR and USSSA; match the exact certification and drop to your league.

  • For older composite bats, used-bat condition matters more than original marketing claims.
  • Used-bat condition can matter more than the original review grade.

What bats are comparable to the 2016 Easton Mako?

Lots of bats try and imitate the Easton MAKO in it's two piece design but only one, we have found, gets close enough to be in the same class by way of pedigree, market penetration and performance. If you are looking for a top end two piece composite bat with great pedigree, massive market acceptance and proven performance than DeMarini's CF8 is its only real rival.

There are some other two piece composite bats which we like a lot and are worth a consideration---although they've yet to be fleshed out by the market like the MAKO or CF series from DeMarini have. For example, the new 2016 Adidas EQT X3 RBZ would be an interesting consideration. Louisville Slugger's 916 Prime should also be on this list. Both are high performing two piece composite bats with buttery swings and big barrels

Within the Easton brand, the MAKO TORQ is a very similar bat---aside from it's rotating handle. The MAKO XL is also similar in it's design, market acceptance and prowess but that version has an added end load.

2017 DeMarini CF Zen

2017 DeMarini CF Zen

Overall: A (93/100) Rank #7/143

Closest same-lane comp: another BBCOR and USSSA two-piece composite to check for feel, value, and model fit.

2015 DeMarini CF7

2015 DeMarini CF7

Overall: A (95/100) Rank #3/143

Closest same-lane comp: another USSSA two-piece composite to check for feel, value, and model fit.

2016 DeMarini CF8

2016 DeMarini CF8

Overall: A- (92/100) Rank #31/126

Closest same-lane comp: another BBCOR and USSSA two-piece composite to check for feel, value, and model fit.

2016 Easton Mako FAQ

Is the 2016 Easton Mako a good bat?
It makes the most sense for this player fit: Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -12 to -3. The score strip and model table are the quickest way to compare the listed variants.
Which 2016 Easton Mako model should I buy?
Start with the certification and drop your player actually needs. Do not use the grade from one certification as a guarantee for a different version.
What bats compare to the 2016 Easton Mako?
Start with 2017 DeMarini CF Zen, 2015 DeMarini CF7, 2016 DeMarini CF8; those are the closest useful cross-shops in this review set.

Video review

How does it rate?

Overall score is Bat Digest's 100-point rating. Prices and availability can move.

Score range: 74-94/100 across 6 scored models Top model: 2016 Easton Mako USSSA -11
Model League Drop Overall score Power Control Quality Value Price Check price
2016 Easton Mako USSSA full bat view Mako JBB16MK12B USSSA -12 90/100 A- A A+ B+ B+ $160
2016 Easton Mako USSSA full bat view Mako SL16MK10 USSSA -10 93/100 A A A+ B+ B+ $350
2016 Easton Mako USSSA full bat view Mako SL16MK10B USSSA -10 93/100 A A A+ B+ B+ $350
2016 Easton Mako USSSA full bat view Mako YB16MK11 USSSA -11 94/100 A A A+ B+ A $280
2016 Easton Mako USSSA full bat view Mako YB16MK12 USSSA -12 90/100 A- A A+ B+ B+ $280
2016 Easton Mako BBCOR full bat view Mako BB16MK BBCOR -3 74/100 C C A B+ C $450

What is the quick review?

The 2016 Easton MAKO is a two piece composite bat built with an extremely light swing weight. It is the lightest swing Easton makes and one of the lightest swinging bats on the market.

What models and sizes are available?

The Easton MAKO is considered, at least by us, the flagship bat of Easton and maybe even all of composite bat baseball. Regardless of your ultimate preference, the MAKO is on everyone's short list of best bats and has, since it's release, redefined the experience of a buttery impact.

How is it built?

This year's version comes with an updated colorway and an improved 'superskin' grip. Other than those minor details, it is virtually unchanged from the 2015 Easton MAKO. It is still a top-shelf performance composite built at the edge of allowable limits. The barrel size is still boat-oar like and the amount of opportunity you get to square up a ball with such limited swing weight is only rivaled by the best in the business.

Some may claim no upgrades is a lazy approach by Easton for their flagship bat in 2016, but it would be hard to make an argument the MAKO needed upgrading. Since 2014, on the MAKO's release, the brightly colored bat has dominated little league and highschool markets as much as any bat ever has. The amount of barrel you get for swing weight is the most on the market (at least in the BBCOR space), it comes in many sizes and is available in every league imaginable. It's helpful the bat model has a reputation as a downright ball killer.

How does it compare?

The 2016 Easton MAKO's origin lies in the neon orange MAKO from 2014. The 2014 version changed the nature of bat marketing, performance, hype and sales and the industry has yet to look back.

In fact, we'd argue the MAKO series is the most influential bat the baseball space has seen within the last 5 years and maybe, at least with some hyperbole, ever. The 2014 version, compared to bats of its class, was ultra flashy and strikingly memorable. It's barrel, at the time, was unrivaled in size and, it should be noted, so was it's price.

The 2015 MAKO didn't change much from the 2014 version and neither did the 2016 version change much from the 2015. Over the years, the bats are very well reviewed by hitters, come in a plethora of designs and several different models.

Other bat companies have tried to close the gap in the last two years and their success is debatable. But no one disagrees that the 2014 Easton MAKO threw down the gauntlet of what a performance baseball bat looks like.

Bat Digest Logo