Bat Digest Logo

2016 Easton MAKO Torq Review

Best Bat Digest score 89/100
Top grade B+
Score range: 73-89/100 across 6 scored models Top model: 2016 Easton Mako Torq USSSA -5
May 31, 2026
Expert Tested
2016 Easton MAKO Torq Review
We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more ›

Who should buy the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq?

If buying: Consider the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq if this matches your player: Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -10 to -3. Choose the exact certification and drop first, then use the score and model table on this page to compare the available versions.

2016 Easton MAKO Torq full bat view

Best for

  • Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -10 to -3.
  • Hitters choosing -10 to -3 drops in BBCOR and USSSA.
  • Shoppers comparing multiple drops or certifications inside the same model line.

Skip if

  • You do not want to sort through certification-specific versions before buying.
  • You want a new warranty-backed bat instead of shopping an older model.

Confidence: Published Review This uses Bat Digest catalog data, ratings data, and existing review notes; current availability, warranty coverage, and used-market condition may vary.

Is the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq a good bat?

The 2016 Easton Z-Core Torq (BBCOR) is a single piece alloy bat reviewed by Bat Digest.

What should you know about the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq?

  • How good is the 2016 Easton Mako Torq in our rankings: It is ranked 57 out of 282 in USSSA -10 bats.
  • Who is the 2016 Easton Mako Torq for: Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -10 to -3.
  • Construction: Two Piece Composite
  • Drop options: -10 to -3
  • Price: $320 - $500

What are the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq specs?

  • Year: 2016
  • Brand: Easton
  • Model Name: Mako Torq
  • Drop: -10 to -3
  • Construction: Two Piece Composite
  • Original Price: $260 - $500

What evidence is this based on?

What we know

  • Available as BBCOR and USSSA, -10 to -3 drops, 28 to 34 inches sizes, $320 - $500 pricing.
  • Construction: Two Piece Composite.
  • The score module is generated from Bat Digest ratings data for the associated model set.

What we have not tested yet

  • Every used-market copy or later production batch.
  • Current seller pricing, warranty coverage, and availability.
  • Whether league rules or stamp requirements have changed since the original review period.
  • Variant, drop, size, price, and certification facts come from current Bat Digest catalog data.
  • Buyer-fit language is based on the existing Bat Digest review notes and watchouts in this file.
  • Scores and score ranges come from Bat Digest ratings data rather than static article copy.

What about durability and legality?

Legality: Multi-certification The line spans BBCOR and USSSA; match the exact certification and drop to your league.

  • For older composite bats, used-bat condition matters more than original marketing claims.
  • Used-bat condition can matter more than the original review grade.

What bats are comparable to the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq?

Outside the Easton brand, there are, obviously, no bats with a rotating handle. In terms of messing with the shape or function of the handle, only the Baden Sports Axe Bat line can claim a similar intent with its asymmetric handle. In terms of high-end two-piece composite bats, the 916 Prime from Slugger, the CF8 from DeMarini, and the RBZ X3 from Adidas are just a few of the light-swinging two-piece composite bats on the market with similar construction when compared to the Easton MAKO. Other than those far-reaching examples, the only bat that is really similar to the Easton MAKO TORQ of 2016 is the 2015 Easton MAKO TORQ version of the same bat. Pricing-wise, at this time, you can pick up the 2015 version of the MAKO TORQ at a pretty big discount.
2017 Rawlings Quatro

2017 Rawlings Quatro

Overall: B- (81/100) Rank #224/424

Closest same-lane comp: another BBCOR and USSSA two-piece composite to check for feel, value, and model fit.

2017 Louisville Slugger Prime 917

2017 Louisville Slugger Prime 917

Overall: B- (80/100) Rank #236/424

Closest same-lane comp: another BBCOR and USSSA two-piece composite to check for feel, value, and model fit.

2016 Louisville Slugger Prime 916

2016 Louisville Slugger Prime 916

Overall: B- (80/100) Rank #236/424

Closest same-lane comp: another BBCOR and USSSA two-piece composite to check for feel, value, and model fit.

2016 Easton MAKO Torq FAQ

Is the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq a good bat?
It makes the most sense for this player fit: Baseball hitters who want a two-piece composite option across BBCOR and USSSA in -10 to -3. The score strip and model table are the quickest way to compare the listed variants.
Which 2016 Easton MAKO Torq model should I buy?
Start with the certification and drop your player actually needs. Do not use the grade from one certification as a guarantee for a different version.
What bats compare to the 2016 Easton MAKO Torq?
Start with 2017 Rawlings Quatro, 2017 Louisville Slugger Prime 917, 2016 Louisville Slugger Prime 916; those are the closest useful cross-shops in this review set.

Video review

How does it rate?

Overall score is Bat Digest's 100-point rating. Prices and availability can move.

Score range: 73-89/100 across 6 scored models Top model: 2016 Easton Mako Torq USSSA -5
Model League Drop Overall score Power Control Quality Value Price Check price
2016 Easton Mako Torq BBCOR full bat view Mako Torq BB16MKT BBCOR -3 77/100 C+ B A A D $500
2016 Easton Z-Core Torq BBCOR full bat view Z-Core Torq BB16ZAT BBCOR -3 73/100 C C A A C $260
2016 Easton Mako Torq USSSA full bat view Mako Torq SL16MKT10B USSSA -10 88/100 B+ A A A C $400
2016 Easton Mako Torq USSSA full bat view Mako Torq SL16MKT5 USSSA -5 89/100 B+ A A+ A C $400
2016 Easton Mako Torq USSSA full bat view Mako Torq SL16MKT8 USSSA -8 87/100 B+ A A A C $400
2016 Easton Mako Torq USSSA full bat view Mako Torq YB16MKT10 USSSA -10 88/100 B+ A A A B $320

What is the quick review?

We've spent at least 20 hours collectively in the cage with the MAKO TORQ brand of bats, including the BBCOR, Little League (youth), and Big Barrel versions. We've also seen the bat at the plate at least one hundred times and spoken to nearly anyone we've seen who uses it about their experience. Additionally, we've spent time on the phone with Easton employees discussing the intricacies of the MAKO TORQ.

What models and sizes are available?

Those experiences, plus a year of mulling them over, have made us appreciate the bat for its uniqueness, but we still struggle to recommend it across the board due to its rotating handle. The bat's base (without the spinning handle) is fantastic as a replica of the 2016 MAKO, and those comfortable with the rotation (or those willing to tape it down) can find a lot of success with the 2016 MAKO TORQ. But for many, the rotating handle (or TORQ) is not quite traditional enough.

How is it built?

  • BBCOR. 31" through 34".
  • 2 5/8 (Senior Barrel) in a Drop 5 and Drop 8. 30" through 32".
  • 2 3/4 (Big Barrel) in a Drop 10. 28" through 32".
  • 2 1/4 Little League (Youth Barrel) in a Drop 10. 28" through 32"
2016 Easton MAKO TORQ is a two-piece composite bat built on the chassis of the very famous Easton MAKO, which has been around since 2014. The TORQ's defining feature is the bottom four inches of the handle, which spin freely around the handle. This rotating feature lends to its name: TORQ. Easton uses the same connective technology (CXN) in its MAKO TORQ as it does in its other performance two-piece bats. CXN is a marketing term for welding technology that connects the barrel of the bat with its handle. In baseball, this is a rather stiff transition, which most hitters prefer. Easton has been using this design since the XL1 and S1 in 2012. The barrel of the 2016 Easton TORQ, made from Easton's THT Thermo Composite, is built to be gigantic and is akin to the barrel size on any of the MAKO barrels.  The MAKO brand of bats is known for their sheer giganticness and was unrivaled until this year. The bat handle is also constructed from Easton's composite THT composite. The MAKO TORQ is meant to be a light swinging bat where the balance point is felt more toward the hands. It is one of the most enormous barrels you can find per swing weight.

Bottom line

As you may know, at batdigest.com, we only review bats we've hit with. With the 2016 Easton MAKO TORQ, we spent several hours in the cage with the BBCOR and youth versions of the bat. In the past, we've spent considerable time with the Fast Pitch Easton MAKO TORQ and the 2015 senior barrel MAKO TORQ, so we knew what to expect. If you are comfortable with the rotating handle (and we're not assuming you are), then the bat is a verifiable beast. It is, in reality, an Easton MAKO with its remarkably sized barrel and the added rotating handle. The bat is clearly a high-performance composite with a butter-like feel on impact. In terms of pure performance, the 2016 Easton MAKO TORQ is a top-shelf premium bat. The barrel size is gigantic by any standards, and the bat is an ultra-light swing weight, as airy homemade rolls. If a player is willing to become accustomed to the spinning handle- or is already so- then the 2016 Easton MAKO TORQ may very well be the exact right bat for them. Otherwise, those looking for an alloy barrel and end-loaded swing weight, a one-piece bat, or a bat without a rotating handle need to look elsewhere.
Bat Digest Logo